Friday, September 18, 2009

Rankin County jury awards $3.3 million in DUI Homicide case

I must be getting senile as this little story has been sitting over at Mississippi Litigation Review for a week and I completely missed it. Local attorney Philip Thomas reported:

"The jury's verdict was for $3,333,189.00. It was a general verdict form, so there was no break-down of the verdict into separate categories. The judgment states that $612,500 was previously paid to the plaintiff on behalf of the losing defendants (Joe Ed Carter and M&A Trucking, Inc.). Therefore, the Court reduced the verdict to $2,720,689 and the judgment was for that amount. The case was filed in 2000, so the tort reform caps do not apply to the judgment.

I do not know what any potential appeal issues are, but Judge Samac Richardson is not reversed often and the plaintiff's attorney (John Toney) is very respected in the legal community. Also, Rankin County juries are as conservative as they get. I would be very surprised if this case is reversed on appeal.

Here is a link to the Mississippi Department of Corrections' profile on Mr. Carter. It states that Mr. Carter was sentenced to 20 years in prison for vehicular homicide and 15 years for aggravated assault
."

Copy of judgement

I spoke to Judge Toney (He used to be a Circuit Judge in Rankin County.) about the case after reading this story and learned some more about the background of this case (It must be pointed out he was very nice and extremely helpful.). Judge Toney sent me the following statement:

"The jury on August 27, 2009, awarded $3,333,189 to the McCrory family for the death of Courtney McCrory.

Courtney was the 19 year-old daughter of Cecil and Janis, sister to Josh. She was a student at USM at the time of her death studying to become a paramedic.

Courtney's death resulted from a traffic accident which occurred on April 7, 2000 at the intersection of Highway 49 South and Main Street (Hwy 469) in Florence. She was a passenger in a vehicle that was struck by a tractor-trailer rig being driven by Joe Ed Carter, an employee of M&A Trucking, Inc. of Canton, MS. Carter ran the red light at the intersection while traveling South on Hwy 49.

Carter was arrested at the scene and charged with DUI Homicide. He was convicted and was sentenced to serve a term of 20 years.

Cecil McCrory currently is a member of the Rankin County School Board, a former legislator, and former Justice Court Judge. Josh McCrory presently serves as a Justice Court Judge.

The McCrory family intends to establish a scholarship fund in Courtney's name to perpetuate her legacy of caring and sharing
."

It should be pointed out the Pogue estate has been submitted to probate in the Rankin County Chancery Court and is represented by Ashland attorney John Farese. It is clear from reading the file Mr. Farese is preparing to file a Wrongful Death action against the Irby's in the same court, thus this verdict is probably a good indicator of how such an action will fare in terms of damages if a verdict is returned for the plaintiffs.

Having said that, our hearts and prayers do go out to the McCrory family as this trial was not easy for them.

27 comments:

Kingfish said...

Meanwhile, Tricia Raymond at MADD is still MIA.

Anonymous said...

I wondering if the Farese Law firm representing the Pogue Estate ever got the logs/records from the JPD of the communications made the night of the Irby wreck. Does anyone know what's going on?

KF. I predict now a Rankin Co. jury would award more in a wrongful death suit for Dr. Pogue than they did in this young woman's death.

Unknown said...

The Irby civil case will be filed in Hinds County. The Pogue estate is in Rankin County becuase that is where he lived. Venue for the civil case against Irby is Hinds County because that is where the wreck happened and that is where the Irbys live. Verdict exposure in Hinds County is generally higher than in Rankin County. But in some cases the nature of the damages (such as death) are that if there is a plaintiff verdict, the verdict will be big no matter where the case is tried. The verdict exposure in the Irby case is huge for multiple reasons, not the least of which is that the deceased were both doctors who would have made a ton of income over their life expectancy.

Anonymous said...

1:58 Thanks for the explanation on the civil case being filed in Hinds Co. I was also thinking about the money both of the doctors would have made in a lifetime had they not been killed-"a ton" as you said.

So, if a civil case is filed against Karen Irby, would Stuart Irby's personal money be Karen Irby's money? He's the one with the money. I doubt seriously she has much of her own.

Anonymous said...

The two physician's families are represented (together) by Mr. Farese. The defendent has offered a pitiful settlement offer (in advance of a case and trial) which the families rejected.

Kingfish said...

I'd like to point out there is no civil suit filed as of this time nor is it clear how many defendants there will be if and when it is filed.

Anonymous said...

KF, you are half right.

Anonymous said...

hmm...lightbulb?

I understand that Stuart isn't criminally liable, but could he be civilly liable for his contribution to the events that took place...being unable to drive IF he drove TO CCJ,buying the drinks for Karen and allowing her to drive when they left?

Don't know if the law would allow it but a jury would sure buy into that theory.

Anonymous said...

I don't believe a jury of compositional peers in a Hinds civil case is going to be pre-disposed to do any Irby any favors. My guess is the opposite. Served on a week long injury case here in Hinds ~5 years ago. My fellow compositional jurors had their minds made up in favor of the carelessly injured plaintiff after the opening arguments. By and large the group brought to the trial an imbedded shared redistributionist mindset before they walked in the door. Something tells me that a Hinds jury won't find it difficult to gore the Irby ox.

Anonymous said...

It's been argued on this blog by some bloggers that Karen wasn't charged with DUI immediately in part because it's an easily defendable charge in MS.

I notice here that the charge is DUI HOMICIDE. Will they argue this is an easy slide as well?

Also, I still have not had those who argue " medical costs" as an explanation for Karen's delay in arrest address the issue of medical costs WHILE ON BOND. I still find it hard to believe a person on bond with INSURANCE would be taxpayer responsibility AND that the accused could be denied medical treatment of THEIR choice IF they can pay for it. NOR do I believe that a taxpayer would have to pay for plastic surgery or that the person charged could choose their physician. I suspect the jail house has a system for medical treatment in place. Contractual?

I'm still at a loss to understand why those under arrest WITH health insurance are taxpayer responsibility .

I GET if they are uninsured or if they cannot pay their premiums after a certain time period because of incarceration, but letting them and the insurance companies off the hook and putting us taxpayers ON the hook, is just WRONG to me.

IF our Insurance Commission has let insurance companies off the hook when those currently insured and who can continue to be included on policies are incarcerated, we need to pummel the Commission with letters.

But, if THAT is the case, us taxpayers need to protest that!

Did Karen's lawyers may have threatened to have her taken off Stuart's policy or give the Sheriff misinformation, and the Sheriff didn't have the brains to check it out or the cojones to call the bluff?

Anonymous said...

I've served on five juries in Hinds County and found they all took their duties seriously with the exception of one person in one case.

I seem to get called every chance they get to call me and I seem to get picked every time though my race, socio-economic profile,past career and post graduate degrees has me pegged as an unlikely choice.

While I agree that juries initially lean towards prosecutors and plantiff's attorneys since the inclination is to protect the community from those who do the wrong thing, I have been relieved to discover that "OJism" didn't happen, but I'm sure the losing attorneys assumed it did and probably said so publicly.

The competence of the attorneys in presenting their case and the orders given by the judge were THE most important elements in my experiences.

Interestingly, the ONE bad juror I encountered was a white male and he announced before we even picked a foreman that he wasn't going to give ANY plantiff ANY money EVER. Now, THERE'S a question that should be asked in voir dire! It was a small amount being sought...less than $5000 for actual damages.

More interesting to me still , was that afterwards, some attorneys asked jurors if they were willing to talk with them about the jury's decision making. These were invariably the best attorneys who asked.

I'm sure there are some bad juries. But, I'm not so sure it's as bad as is often assumed.

On some famous/infamous cases , if we heard what the jury heard, we'd have to rule the same way. Not all the facts or rulings or instructions make the paper. The McDonald's coffee case transcript is worth a read as an example. Also, the Ford Pinto lawsuit is worth a read.

Anonymous said...

9:45 AM the whole notion of medical costs was a gigantic smoke screen by Sheriff Campaign Contribution who knew that no one in the media would challenge him about it and even if they did he'd feed them more bullshit to derail their line of questioning. The local media -- including the JFP -- is OWNED by our Hinds Sheriff.

Hinds County, not the City of Jackson, is the responsible paying party for medical bills but ONLY if the person is in PHYSICAL CUSTODY. Do you really believe that Hinds is required to pay medical costs for everyone arrested, released and waiting trial? That is not only thousands of people every year but too many of those arrests also don't come to trial for sometimes years.

Sheriff Campaign Contribution kicks criminals to the street (releases them from physical custody) all the time in order to avoid paying for medical care. He even releases those who should rightly remain in physical custody for public safety purposes in order to avoid paying for medical care. But in those circumstances he'll do his little tap dance and claim he had to release that dangerous person because he was out of rooms at the inn and that his other guests were more dangerous than the dangerous person he released.

Sheriff Campaign Contribution could have made arrangements to book and release Karen Irby at her hospital bedside if he wanted to. But copious contributions of campaign cash do talk real loud.

Alongside the matter of the Sheriff's Irby favoritism is the massive conflict of interest brought on this situation by the fact that county-wide elected Sheriff Campaign Contribution was also serving at the time as the appointed Chief of the Jackson Police Department. You see, even if medical costs were an issue -- and they were not -- the costs were the concern of the Hinds County Sheriff NOT the Chief of JPD.

The Chief of JPD was obligated to direct his staff to make the arrest but was conflicted from doing so because the other elected hat he wore was there on his head in large part via the generous contributions of Irby largesse. That same conflict will also loom mighty large when the pre-crash details become public at trial time.

Early retirement anyone?

Kingfish said...

I think the issue is whether the concept of negligent entrustment applies to Mr. Irby and goes past his insurance policy to his assets.

My understanding is that the inmate care was for indigent prisoners, not those with insurance.

The JFP won't say much because Natalie Irby used to work for Donna and is good friends with her not to mention Mr. Irby funds Crossroads and serves on the Board with Mr. Stauffer. Indeed, their first headline on this story did not mention the doctors' deaths and wasn't mentioned until the third paragraph. Only when several commentors pointed it out several days later did Ms. Ladd change her headline.

As for the favoritism, Mac deserves to catch heat for it, not that he cares because he doesn't. Also Mrs. Irby shouldn't catch the heat for it as she was incapticated, her husband was in a coma as well so that means there was one family member that was able to pull strings, if they were pulled. Alot of the early mistakes in this case angered many people and justifiably so but the outrage should be directed somewhere else besides the two people who were pretty much incapable of even ordering a hamburger.

Anonymous said...

My condolences to the McCrory family who lost their 19 year old daughter Courtney in this tragic, senseless wreck. I am positive that these past 9 years have been more than difficult for this family and no amount of money can ever replace the life of a child. You can never fully realize the heartbreak unless it happens to you, until it's your child. Tomorrow is not a promise. For some of us, this lesson was learned too late.

Seems even the highly conservative jury of Rankin Co could not deny these plaintiffs. What i thought was very interesting in this case: Carter, the man driving the rig, was arrested AT THE SCENE and charged with DUI Homicide. Could it be said that the city police/sheriff have much influence over the verdicts of these types of cases? It starts with the police & media which, of course, influences a juries opinion. How could it not?

Anonymous said...

Thank you 10:56 and KF for your answers to my questions.

The answers were as I expected but needed confirmation from those with more knowledge of how the system works.

Your point about who directed post accident events is well taken.

But, now that hamburgers can be ordered, what happens?

If those hired while Stuart and Karen were incapable are still on board and if whatever strategy developed during those days is still in play, then that has to be with Karen's and Stuart's agreement, does it not?

To me, this seems to be where it could ethically dicey if financial interests and individual interests are ever in conflict.

Anonymous said...

I think its pretty simple regarding her arrest at a later date, they did not want an incriminating-looking mugshot. Imagine the injuries, the reconstruction, and ultimately the severity of the injuries/wreck. It puts a truly emotional spin to the story.

As for the CL, JFP, MADD, etc. - I think that it is amazing the way they have participated or not participated in the reporting and making statements regarding this incident. Here are a few of the organizations that serve the public according to their mission. I have yet to see them fulfill that mission regarding the Irby incident, maybe I have missed something...

Kingfish said...

I suspect Mrs. Irby has little say over or control over anything. She can fire her attorney all day long, but she still has to pay for one and I also suspect she wasn't given unlimited access to the family funds. If she is guilyy she is guilty but she also deserves her day in court as well and a chance to tell her side of it and prove her innocence. For all we know something might have happened. I have a hard time believing someone who had 2 or 3 glasses of wine and was only a .09 (and I'm assuming it was wine) suddenly decides to go that fast. There is something else there and is another reason she should have her day in court.

Anonymous said...

Why does MADD even exist in Jackson, MS?

Tricia Raymond has proven to be completely and utterly incompetent in her position as executive director (not limited to just the Irby case). At least make a statement or send out a press release regarding some of the recent DUI deaths. Remind the public of the dangers and consequences of driving under the influence. Truly pathetic.

I would encourage anyone who agrees, to contact the national office of MADD.

http://www.madd.org/About-Us/About-Us/Contact-Us.aspx

This organization does a lot of fine things (on a national basis). It is so SADD that the residents of Mississippi are subject to "politics" with regard to such a serious issue, drunk driving related deaths.

Kingfish said...

I remember last year discontinuing the New Year's Eve MADD Taxi program so they could work on stronger triggerlock legislation.

Does anyone know how that turned out?

Anonymous said...

Even if the Pogue and Dedousis families got 3 times this judgment, it won't have that much of a financial impact on the Irbys.

$6 million , oh, that's a what? a plane? Chartering a private jet for a couple of years would be awful?

There's no financial deterrent or penalty at play here ESPECIALLY if tort reform caps apply.

Tort reform caps should have been tied to a percentage of net worth.

If you've got a billion, a million is chump change. If you make $500 bucks a week, you'll never recover from a $100000 judgment.

And, there should be financial risks for those who file suits without factual merit...or at least some judicial enforcement of the ethical rules in place.

And, if there are no criminal risks then civil judgment risk becomes a profit decision ONLY. That's exactly the decision Ford made ( headed by Iocacca) in the Pinto case...a formula for how much the known deaths would cost in civil suits vs the cost of adding an O ring to keep the gas tank from exploding.

Kingfish said...

There is no cap on economic damages...... which would probably include future earnings.

Anonymous said...

The economic damages in EACH of these cases will be in the tens of millions.

Anonymous said...

Did anyone find out who the Irby car was titled to? Was it a personal or company vehicle?

Anonymous said...

Very good point. Although, I do not think it is relevant. They sold the company to an European company a few years ago.

Anonymous said...

Might be very relevant.

Anonymous said...

10s of millions sounds big until one looks at the net worth.

You can spend $10 million to buy one private jet.

$30 million not only won't put them in the " poor house", they'll still be multi-millionaires.

And, if the victims had been teachers, economic damages would be nothing .

If the corporate entity didn't own the car, I'd be shocked if the entity didn't buy the car new originally, put a couple of thousand miles on it and sold it to them at a " depreciated" value. Of course, they drove it from the 'get go'.

That's one of the things one can do if one has enough money. Sorta like if you have a hunting camp, you can get your car tag in that county with the low ad valorem.

The lifestyles of the rich aren't like ours.

Anonymous said...

Yessiiirrrreeeee.

A highly comp'd Crisler supportin' Gore/Kerry/Obama contributin' NEJammer Democrat attorney has a spread of land in another nearby county where the taxes are low, low, low. Nothin', I mean nothin', on the land but an address # in big black letters on the mailbox out at the rural county road.

All the family rides are registered there. Benz, Escalade, 7 series Bimmer, lifted Chevy 4WD huntin' truck, V8 speedboat. Each one of 'em tied to that little mailbox while fellow donkeys Eddie Fair and Malcolm McMillin look the other way. Hmmmmmm, I $$$wonder$$$ why?



Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.